Archive for the ‘Green’ Category

CSA sharecropping

Saturday, June 13th, 2009

This is also posted at my other blog, Sustainably.

The facet I like most about Charlie Radoslovich’s Rad Urban Farmers business model is that he is a farmer without any land. From the top, you know he’s either a wacko or on to something significant. I’m thinking it’s the latter.

He told me he didn’t devise the ideas, but he’s certainly on the front edge of the wave. If he’s successful, think how much land under lawn-grass cultivation could be converted to productive use.

Anyway, a key component for him is finding OPL (other people’s land), so here’s a bit of perspective from Christine Zendeh of Lexington, whom I interviewed for my Globe story but whose comments I wasn’t able to use.

Zendeh and her husband, Soheil, have given over a 20×25-foot plot of land with excellent sun to Radoslovich. They can expect to get up to 10 pounds of fresh, locally grown produce a week, all for the initial investment of about $100. It’s cheap, but they’re the landlords, after all. Radoslovich, meanwhile, will sell what doesn’t go to landowers at the Lexington Farmers Market.

It’s interesting to note that they won’t reap produce only from their yard. Radoslovich said each plot varies not only in size but in soil and light conditions as well. That means each site will yield different crops, and he’ll consolidate before handing out shares.

Zendeh said they were admirers from the start.
“We thought this was just a brilliant, creative, wonderful idea. We’d been looking into sustainability and being connected, providing for what you need, locally, so we don’t use all the fossil fuels, etc.”

Zendeh said the family has purchases CSA shares before, wanting to support local farmers, whose skills she admires. “I’m not much of a farmer, and Charlie has made that portion of our yard productive and fertile.”

She described her food outlook as “the whole Alice Waters thing.”

“I know when you get something fresh, and it hasn’t been sprayed with pesticides, you can actually eat it. Like eating a real tomato, instead of a plastic tomato.”

Urban vegetable farming

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

In a story for the Boston Globe food section, I introduce three green-thumbed green thinkers who are raising produce on former lawns. Costs and yields vary, but community building, sustainability, and locavorism are common to all three approaches.

“Green doesn’t have to be more expensive”

Friday, November 14th, 2008

Another in a series of miniprofiles of sustainability-minded people who are working to reduce humankind’s footprint on the planet. They’re “mini” not only because they’re short, but because all the questions are 10 words or less, and the answers are requested to match. (Please, no counting.)

addie-cranston.jpg

ADDIE CRANSTOUN, 29, Waltham
Manager, Green Depot, Stoneham

Green Depot sells building materials focused on environmentally friendly products. Stoneham is one of five locations for the company, which is headquartered in Brooklyn, N.Y.

Green epiphany: “In elementary school, one of the first major issues I tackled was concern about our ozone layer.”

Green hero:Jane Goodall. Not only for the work she’s done, but recently, she’s doing more speaking and trying to educate children that they can have sustainability at the forefront of their future.”

A sustainability practice you recently took on: “We added composting and rain barrels to our house.”

An example of greenwashing that really bothers you: “Paint. Manufacturers change chemicals to say they’re low VOC, but no one knows if the products are cleaner or healthier.”

What don’t people understand? “That green doesn’t have to be more expensive.”

A neat product you wish you’d thought of: “Ultratouch. Recycled cotton denim jeans insulation.”

The one thing you wish everyone would just get right: “Recycling.”

Can we spend our way into sustainability? “No.”

The state of green building in Boston

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

I have a story on the state of green building in Greater Boston in the current issue of GreenSource magazine, commissioned on the occasion of GreenBuild, the US Green Building Council’s national convention. As many as 30,000 builders, developers, architects and other green partisans are expected at the Convention and Exposition Center next Wednesday through Friday (Nov. 19-21).

You can see the whole story here, but to summarize, I found a very vibrant community, anchored by leaders (Menino, Patrick) who do more than talk about green development; a high percentage of development led by nonprofits, which are more likely to go green (witness Harvard’s decisions for its $589 million science complex in Allston designed by Behnisch, Behnisch & Partners); and the region’s academic centers, which place their stamp not only on architectural currents but engineering.

EnerNOC is an example of the latter, a leader is demand-response management. In briefest summary, it has two sets of clients: companies willing to let them, for a fee, control some of their energy practices, some of the time, and utilities willing to pay for reductions in electricity demand. This is a forerunner of what may be one of the most profound changes this century, the smart grid, on which I’ve written for E/The Environmental Magazine. (It’s submitted, but won’t be out until January.)

They’re even going green over at Fenway, which isn’t a reference either to the Monstah or the grass. The Red Sox unveiled an extensive solar hot-water array back in May:

p1000634.jpg
From left: Bruce Johnson from National Grid; state Energy and Environmental Affairs secretary Ian Bowles; Kevin McCollister of GroSolar, which installed the panels; Red Sox president Larry Lucchino; and Patrick Nye of Bonneville Environmental Foundation. The panels, which are affixed to the roof above the State Street Pavilion, are in the background.

Bucky Fuller, visionary

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

I once said in print that Jean Luc Ponty was the greatest jazz violinist alive, and a friend who was a more seasoned music critic blanched at my boldness — who was I to opine so broadly? He was certainly right — I’m nowhere near the authority on such a matter. But I also felt that not only was it a defensible opinion, but who was anyone to say otherwise, definitively? No objective standard exists to settle the point.

That anecdote comes to mind as I say this: Richard Buckminster Fuller is one of the 10 most interesting, illustrious, brilliant, and accomplished Americans ever to live, and of all those who would legitimately be listed in that group, he is probably one of the least known.

I’m prompted to raise his name, a quarter-century after his death, because I’ve just finished reading “Buckminster Fuller’s Universe” by Lloyd Steven Sieden, published by Perseus in 1989. I was prompted to read the book under the influence of the Biomimicry Guild; I was lucky to attend a two-day workshop given by cofounder Dayna Baumeister recently in Boston. The book was listed on a workshop reading list. (What is biomimicry? The Guild’s website says: “An innovation method that seeks sustainable solutions by emulating nature’s time-tested patterns and strategies, e.g., a solar cell inspired by a leaf.” Here’s an example. Here’s another.)

Ordinarily when I write a book review, it’s about ideas, plot, word choice, and whatever else presents itself. But with apologies to Sieden, this is all about Bucky, as he was known to friends. Also, I think the best way to share what I learned is in discrete sections, rather than in a narrative.

First, the biomimicry angle (it’s only fair): It turns out that Fuller was a biomimicrist decades before the term was coined. His family summered at Bear Island in Maine, and it was his tedious task to row over for the mail. Having observed the jellyfish, he fashioned a new propulsion device using one oar instead of two, attached at the back instead of on a side. At its end, Fuller fashioned an umbrella-like device (imagine its orientation so that the umbrella handle, if there’d been one, would have been at oar’s end) that would close when Fuller pulled the oar toward the boat and fan out when pushed away. Not only did Fuller shorten the trip by half, Sieden says, he got to watch where he was going. He was still a boy.

Mimicking without a subject to play off of: If you know of Bucky at all, it’s probably for his geodesic dome, the only structure whose size isn’t limited by the strength of its material (imagine, say, a skyscraper built of wood, for instance — couldn’t be done). (Bucky actually conceived of a dome that could float, if it got big enough. Because of the domed shape, air volume would grow at a far greater rate than materials needed, until the weight of the materials would be negligible. Anyway…) After Fuller died, researchers discovered fullerenes, a family of carbon molecules with many potential applications in nanotechnology, including heat resistance and superconductivity. They were named for Fuller because their shapes are very similar to the dome, which he conceived in the ’20s and built beginning in the late ’40s. The shape has also been discovered on hard virus shells. He was “mimicking” structures no one had yet ever seen!

The Forrest Gump effect: Eventually, his ideas brought him to the attention and popularity of world leaders, leading to friendships with Indira Ghandi and others, but he was connected to other great lights even before birth:

  • His great aunt was Margaret Fuller, the transcendentalist. He was the sixth generation of Fullers to attend Harvard, and one of his predecessors cofounded the Hasty Pudding Club. Bucky attended, but never graduated; he was tossed out twice, and never got a college degree.
  • He was a habitue of Romany Marie’s bistro in Greenwich Village. On his first visit there, the only two people there were Marie and a “pale young man” introduced as Eugene O’Neill. Later, he met there, and formed a lifelong friendship with, Isamu Noguchi.
  • When he lived in Chicago, also during the ’20s, he drank at a speakeasy with a fellow who would soon become famous — Al Capone.
  • Despite being fairly short and very near-sighted, he carved out a career in the Navy that had many highlights — he cruised to Europe on the ship that took Woodrow Wilson to participate in the discussions at Versailles after World War I. But later, he formed a strong friendship with Vincent Astor, the Harvard student who became superwealthy overnight when his father died on the Titanic, when both served in naval squadron training in New York harbor.
  • In the early ’30s, Fuller bought an architectural magazine by cashing in insurance policies. For his first issue, he named as guest editor the aspiring architect Philip Johnson.
  • If you don’t know the geodesic dome, you might know Fuller for his Dymaxion car, which was revolutionary in several ways, including its three-wheel design and its aerodynamic shape. It got 35 mph (this was 1933) and sat 11. Amelia Earhart was one of its first occupants, after she attended its public unveiling and was so taken by its originality that she asked it be her official coach during a week of events in Washington, D.C.
  • This isn’t nearly a complete list.

    Einstein thought he was smart: Through yet another friend, the author Christopher Morley, Bucky got a book contract to spread his ideas, but when he submitted “Nine Chains to the Moon” to Lippincott, the editors balked at including three chapters that discussed the ideas of Albert Einstein, because they had checked the lists of people who were said to understand Einstein’s theories, and Bucky wasn’t on it. Even though he had no connection to Einstein, he suggested the editors go to the source. A month later, Fuller was summoned to meet with Einstein, who’d read the manuscript and would be visiting New York. Here’s what Sieden reports that Bucky said Einstein said: “Young man, you amaze me. I cannot conceive of anything I have ever done as having the slightest practical application. I evolved all this in the hope that it might be of use to cosmogonists and to astrophysicists in gaining a better understanding of the universe, but you appear to have found practical applications for it.” Oh — the book ran with the Einstein chapters intact.

    A poet who didn’t know it: Fuller’s writing was stylishly singular enough that Time magazine called it “Fullerese.” (Not sure I’d be honored if my style was christened Pragerese, but I digress.) While working for the copper concern Phelps Dodge, he once wrote a report for the board that was rejected because the executive couldn’t understand it. Then Bucky read it to him aloud, in short bursts, and the executive got it. He asked Bucky to rewrite it, punctuating it as he had read it aloud. When Bucky did, the executive agreed that it was now lucid, but that it was poetry, and he couldn’t conceive forwarding a poem to the board. Bucky would continue writing poetry over years, and in 1962, he was awarded the Charles Eliot Norton Chair of Poetry at Harvard. Can you believe this guy?

    An altruist…: Any complete discussion of Fuller has to include his Dymaxion Map (btw: the word, a trademark he used for decades, came from dynamic, maximum, and ion), which he considered to be a far truer depiction of the planet than the Mercator map in use for centuries (and still). He felt it was needed to better show the interrelationships of all people on Earth. From 1927, after the death of his first daughter, Fuller swore than he would not pursue riches, but dedicate himself to improving life for all of Earth’s citizens. He reasoned that if an effort would advance the condition of life, it would bring remuneration, and indeed, though it took a while, the world did come to crave his ideas, and he was paid very well to present them in a never-ending lecture tour.

    … but not a saint: He was a carouser for decades — his first expulsion from Harvard was because he withdrew the money his mother had put aside for his tuition and board and spent it on chasing actresses in New York City. Notice that previous anecdotes report his presence, more than once, in drinking establishments. And, what he gave to the world, he withheld from his family. This wasn’t unusual for his time, but not only was his wife a saint, she needed to be.

    Etc.: I could go on, but already this is very long, so I’ll just toss these in, strictly ’cause they’re interesting:

  • Bucky was working on a dome for Ebbets Field when the Dodgers decided instead to move to Los Angeles in 1957. Can you imagine — a domed stadium in the ’50s? Though he wasn’t the listed architect because a bit of industrial sabotage, his work was later acknowledged as the underpinning for the first sports dome, Houston’s Astrodome.
  • When Nixon and Khrushchev had their famed “kitchen debate” in 1959, they were standing in a Bucky-designed dome in Moscow; his design had been selected by the US for an American exposition there.
  • Still, I have only scratched the surface. Sieden had a very large, very difficult task, since many of Fuller’s ideas were born of brilliant original thought, involving spherical geometry and a multitude of other subjects outside most people’s expertise. I recommend “Buckminster Fuller’s Universe” wholeheartedly. As for Fuller, he’s been gone a quarter-century and still you could call him a visionary, not only of his time but of ours.

    Mini-nuke plants

    Friday, November 7th, 2008

    Writing at offgrid.com, Nick Rosen discusses micro-nuclear plants, which, the story says, could power 20,000 homes for 10 years or more.

    The devices, said to be only a few feet across, would be buried well underground, have no moving parts, and be powered by low-energy uranium that would be difficult to enrich into nuclear weapons. All the steam, to run turbines, and waste would be contained underground.

    The idea was developed at Los Alamos. Hyperion Power, which has leased the technology, says its first unit will be installed in 2013. The devices will go for about $25 million each.

    I’m not a scientist, so I don’t immediately understand the implications. Proliferation and storage of the waste long term are two of my greatest concerns, and this technology seems to address both. But if we can’t agree on a safe large-scale burial site, I don’t know how storing waste in dozens of little burial sites will be better.

    Still, worth learning more about.

    Nukes’ No. 1 problem: Not pretty enough?

    Friday, November 7th, 2008

    On the NYT’s Greenbiz blog, an entry says that pro-nuclear interests are trying to rebrand the industry, in part by seeking ways to make the plants more good looking.

    I kid you not.

    untitled-1-copy.jpg

    So let’s take a poll. How many of you would be more pro nuclear if it was painted green? Never mind all that poisonous-for-practically-ever waste, or the massive subsidies that would be needed to build the plants. You just want them to look nicer.

    Fabulous glimpse at the green Obama

    Thursday, November 6th, 2008

    The anecdote comes from Newsweek, via gristmill.com.

    What we’re in for [updated]

    Thursday, November 6th, 2008

    OK, so now we have the guy we wanted in the White House. So what is the outlook for clean tech?

    Martin Lamonica, green-tech writer at CNet, surveys the landscape. I am always informed by Martin’s writing.

    [added] Greenbiz.com covers some of the same ground, but also looks at how voters reacted to clean-energy referenda nationwide.

    “Think about the surrounding community”

    Thursday, November 6th, 2008

    Another in a series of miniprofiles of sustainability-minded people who are working to reduce humankind’s footprint on the planet. To recap, they’re “mini” not only because they’re short, but because all the questions are 10 words or less, and the answers are requested to match. Please, no counting.

    amy-bauman1.jpg

    AMY BAUMAN, Somerville
    Owner, greenGoat

    GreenGoat helps contractors and architects pare building-material waste, in part by repurposing what previously would have been discarded. “If we need to write specification language, we do that. If they need a waste management plan, we do that. And if the building owners need us to help them get the downstream vendors right, we do that too,” Bauman says

    Green epiphany: “Watching a dumpster leave my own house filled with things I knew were useful.”

    Green hero: “My neighbors, who put our their blue bins rain or shine.”

    A recent addition to greenGoat’s portfolio: “Helping contractors reclaim landscaping. We now save plants, in addition to building materials.”

    An example of greenwashing that really bothers you: “A few days ago, some large pickup truck maker was claiming it was the greenest ‘in its class.’ I just kind of sat back and laughed. Utility vehicles have a long way to go before they’re green, but that’s not why we would buy one.”

    Tell me something most people don’t understand: “That you don’t have to do everything, today, right now, and no one’s going to judge you if you don’t live and breathe this stuff. You have to make it work for you.”

    A bit of deconstruction wisdom: “Think about the surrounding community when you’re planning where things could go. Make it a little more personal. Think about the church down the street.”

    Something reused at your house: “Architectural plans … as wrapping paper and message pads.”

    Technology you’re most hopeful about: “Power generation by tidal power.”

    The one thing you wish everyone would just get right: “Non toxic cleaning materials.”

    What’s a question I should have asked you? “Name your most beautiful failure.”

    And your answer? “There were some really great industrial doors that we wanted to give away out of a Fort Point warehouse, and the building owner’s lawyers got in the way because of lead paint.”

    Are we going to make it? “Yes.”

    Can you expand on that a little? “Every species evolves, we’re no different.”

    Five ideas from Secretary Bowles

    Thursday, November 6th, 2008

    Dave Beard, major domo at boston.com who maintains an interest in green matters, turned to Ian Bowles, Mass. secretary for energy and the environment, for five suggestions to the president-elect. Good idea, and good ideas. Check them out here.

    Now it can be told (campaign edition)

    Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

    The headline is far more portentous than this post warrants, for if you combine the faint ripples of my scribblings with the mildness of the substance, there’s not much to “reveal.” But I decided nevertheless that, before the election, I didn’t want to write anything that could in the slightest way be construed as negative.

    I ended up working for the Obama campaign three times. I wrote about the first time previously, so I won’t detail it here. But in short, it was not rewarding or uplifting in the slightest, and I had to content myself with the knowledge that I was there for a cause, not for entertainment, and that if that’s what they wanted me to do, then that was what was needed.

    I really needed that attitude the second time, last Saturday, when I accompanied a friend and a friendly woman who rode up with us up to Manchester, N.H. We were assigned 50-60 specific residences — identified previously as likely pro-Obama — and it really sucked. At many of the houses, there were three cars in the driveway and signs of movement inside, but no answer at the door. There was no doubt — these people were avoiding us!

    A couple of the times that people did come to the door, they expressed their extreme weariness at the pesterings of people like us. “You’re the fifth person to knock on the door,” one woman said. I didn’t want to make the intrusion worse, so I didn’t ask if they were all for Obama, or over what period it was, but it didn’t matter anyway. It was hard to see how we were helping anyone or anything.

    That night, I related this story to a friend who lives in Manchester, and he confirmed the basics. He then followed up the next day with a call from the scale in his kitchen: “Just from the weekend, the leaflets left on our porch weigh 1.4 pounds. Just from the weekend!”

    It’s fair to point out: It was the final-weekend push, and it was general inundation, not just from Obama. And New Hampshire, of course, has longer campaigns than anyone, so they are more prone to canvass fatigue.

    Even so, I had no idea there was a resource/profligacy issue tangled up in this! Think of all the trees that died, and for what? To annoy those the campaigns want to draw close? Not just waste, but alienation — the vote-for-me double play!

    Yesterday, on my third try, I finally found my niche, entering data in the back room — literally — of the Arlington Obama office. Because the place was packed — the fever pitch was palpable, as the body heat of three dozen volunteers, many of them using their own cell phones to call Indiana, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, raised the atmosphere to stuffy — it was still semi-social, but I finally felt as if I wasn’t being a public nuisance.

    Even then, I couldn’t escape evidence of it. My role was to enter results of other people’s calls into a voter database, to help the campaign focus its get-out-the-vote effort. More than once, the same names came under my cursor from different lists, and several times, I saw callers’ margin notations that this person had just been called by someone else.

    The conventional line is that the Obama campaign was exceptionally organized, and I wouldn’t challenge that — it is on the verge of electing a mixed-race Illinoisan to the leadership of a nation built, in part, on slavery — but in tiny sliver I was exposed to, there sure were lots of warts.

    Supremacist on talk radio

    Monday, November 3rd, 2008

    Of course talk radio is dominated by boneheads, but a guy I heard WEEI sports talk last week — by no means a troglodyte and almost eloquent in a townie kind of way— is still holding space in my head.

    His topic was Question 3 on the Mass. ballot, which would (will) ban dog racing in the state. My position is, there is no intellectually or morally justified position in support of that moldering business, and I regret I can cast only one vote to put it out of the dogs’ misery.

    “Let’s get this straight,” he said, with as much certainty as I have on the opposite side. “There’s humans, and there’s everything else. They’re here for us to do with as we wish. Period.” (Note: I was driving, so the quotes are accurate only in their sense, but not word for word.)

    This is, to coin a phrase, why there are horse races. And dog races. And dog fighting. Just like people who voted for George Bush a second time, I just don’t get it. Not just that I don’t agree; I cannot fathom how someone has come to that conclusion.

    I’m not a member of PETA, and I don’t aspire to be. I’m still eating animals, and will kill mosquitoes when they’re bothering me. But in my continuing exploration of biomimicry, one point I’ve been convinced of is that we are not “apart” from nature, we are “a part” of it. Yeah, we got the language skills, but we also got this overwhelming hubris, and I’m not sure it was an even exchange.

    If we’re so freakin’ smart, how come we’re despoiling the environment in a way that no other species does? The rule in the rest of the animal kingdom is maintain habitat, because that’s how to survive. Why do those “lower” species know what we haven’t figured out yet?

    I don’t think we have been granted dominion, but if we have, I have no doubt we should exercise it benevolently — I don’t know how anyone who’s ever been under the despotic thumb of a boss or parent could conclude otherwise. Even if I could ask the caller that question, I doubt I’d understand his reply.

    Statewide climate action conference

    Monday, November 3rd, 2008

    The Mass. Climate Action Network, a coalition of locally organized groups fighting the climate crisis, is holding its statewide event, the seventh annual, in a couple of weeks, on Sunday, Nov. 16 at the Stata Center at MIT; the school’s Technology and Culture Forum is cohost.

    Among the speakers will be Ian Bowles, state secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs, and David Gershon, chief executive of the Empowerment Institute and author of “Low Carbon Diet: A 30 Day Program to Lose 5,000 Pounds,” winner of the Independent Publisher “Most Likely to Save the Planet” book award.

    Workshop topics will include:
    Adapting to our Changing Climate

  • Envisioning a Sustainable World
  • Renewable Power at Home
  • Hot Issues in the State Legislature
  • Green Jobs in the Northeast.
  • The event runs from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Fee for nonmembers, which includes lunch, is $60; prices are lower for MCAN members and students. Sponsors include Clean Power Now, Mass Technology Collaborative, NSTAR, Rebecca’s Café, and Whole Foods. To register: www.acteva.com/go/mcan

    Back to the “leadership” thing

    Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

    I am, of course, voting for Barack Obama on Tuesday. He is the clear choice, especially considered in the light of John McCain, who, to me, is a pale, sorry version of what he once presented to the American people, a hope for honest, straightforward leadership. “Craven panderer” is about all he has left, and it has been disgusting to watch.

    I’m disappointed to find myself, again, in the position of voting against someone, rather than for someone. That’s an overstatement — I like a lot of what Obama says, and I’m not at all concerned about the experience factor. McCain’s been around a long time, but I don’t think he has the experience that I’d want in a leader, which is, to say, leadership. More than Obama has proven to me that he is going to be a good president, McCain has proven to me that we will continue our spiral into bellicose global has-been if he is elected.

    Hope for leadership is what drew me to Obama initially, several years ago. Certainty that Hillary Clinton would triangulate, rather than lead, was my foremost reason for not supporting her. But I won’t be more enthusiastic about Obama until I see more evidence of leadership — the ability and willingness to steer a course based on principle, and the ability to bring along skeptics who are nevertheless willing to follow.

    This issue has resurfaced for me in recent days because of unconnected references I’ve heard about the US’s path to the moon. First is a TED Talk by Burt Rutan, whose company won the X Prize for sending a privately funded craft toward space twice within a week. The talk was recorded in 2006 but I heard it only this week.

    Rutan begins by talking about our failure to inspire youth toward exploring the unknown — “I feel strongly that it’s not good enough for us to have generations of kids who think it’s OK to look forward to a better version of a cell phone with a video in it. They need to look forward to exploration. … We need to inspire them because they need to lead us and help us survive in the future.”

    Last night, I believe it was my friend Ron who shared something he heard on tape, that the average age of the people in Mission Control on the night we landed on the moon was 26. He continued by pointing out that that put the average age of those people at 18 when President Kennedy committed us to go to the moon, “not because it’s easy but because it is hard.”

    Those teenagers were fired up by a leader’s declaration of purpose. They pointed their lives toward a goal inspired by our president.

    That’s what I’m talking about. In the aftermath of 9/11, meanwhile, Bush was certainly bullheaded, but when it came time to inspire people over our gravest threat to peace, he told us to go shopping. That’s what 40 years can do to a nation.

    I talked, in my previous post, about how people often refer back to our moon shot as proof of American can-do. I would add that Kennedy’s call to purpose remains the most outstanding example of a national call to action in 40 years as well.

    I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

    There is general agreement that our trek to the moon delivered an avalanche of technology that benefitted daily life. But we didn’t start out with that goal. Kennedy’s call arose from national pride and competitiveness and from the spirit of exploration.

    Such motivations will merely be supporting factors if our next president calls us to action on the matter of our energy future. In this fight, there is clear and present danger, and the first purposes of concerted innovation would be to safeguard national — and international — security while improving the daily lives of every citizen.

    We don’t have to have the answers before we embark. Undoubtedly, President Kennedy had advice that reaching the moon was an achievable goal, but it was not a certainty. Nevertheless, he said “let’s go” and we did, and 40 years later, we still consider it the most impressive task we ever achieved.

    If we still are that great nation capable of anything, there is no greater goal than resolving the energy crises facing us. And we need a leader to light the rocket.

    Global warming cafe

    Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

    p1010292_2.jpg
    Participants chat between question sessions.

    I joined about 15 others for a “global warming cafe” in West Medford yesterday, and was glad to be among my peeps for a couple of hours. Generally, these were people who are clued into the needs and demands of climate change, and many of them do quite a lot already.

    The format was to sit in ad hoc small groups to answer each of a handful of questions posed by the moderator, Susan Altman. I was late and missed the first one, which covered people’s fears about the situation. The second question was about hopes for a solution.

    I was skeptical, and a bit afraid, as I approached the question, unable to think of much. But as each table reported its results, someone commented, “we had more hope than we thought.” Altman responded that the same sentiment had arisen at a cafe she led in Franklin a couple of weeks ago. Some of what we came up with:

  • A confidence in American ingenuity, that once we set our minds to something, we can accomplish it. (I do think that’s true, but I do note — have noted for some time — that when you ask someone for an example, the one that almost always comes up is that we went to the moon. And that, of course, happened almost 40 years ago.)
  • Increased consumer demand for green products.
  • Leaders are paying more attention to the issue.
  • Growth in the eat local/buy local movements.
  • “Healthy respect,’ one table’s coinage for the changes in people’s attitudes about getting involved. (Do you find this true? Please leave a comment, either way.)
  • Growing economic incentives to be green, such as when gas prices spiked.
  • Evidence that those incentives are working, such as increased T ridership, increased cycling, and more people walking.
  • After we reshuffled ourselves into new groupings, we were asked to name actions we could take as individuals and as part of groups, and heard a pitch for the “Low Carbon Diet,” a book by David Gershon that offers a palette of 24 actions one can take to reduce one’s carbon footprint by 5,000 pounds in a month. The suggestion is to attempt this in groups of several households, for mutual support and encouragement.

    A suggestion for action that I liked was for group members — in a church, or a community center, or in a company — to try to influence climate-friendly change. It’s better than working alone, and change is far more likely to come from within.

    Conserve!

    Thursday, October 30th, 2008

    Shannon Koenig and I met this morning to talk about conservation. We met through Sustainable Arlington, a grassroots effort to promote planet-friendly consciousness and practices in our town.

    The meeting was an outgrowth of previous discussions, but today’s topic was mine. I’m very drawn to gadgetry and other technology, but there is absolutely no question that the No. 1 priority for anyone interested in sustainability should be conservation. Just take less. Use less. Spend less. It offers a bigger payoff than solar or wind or geothermal. We will need all those, but before we spend a penny on any of them, we should wring every bit of waste and profligacy out of our current practices.

    (Please note: I believe in this wholeheartedly, and we’ve done a lot at our house to do our part, but I’m still plenty profligate. We’re in progress, yes, but we could do a lot more, and we could take on these changes sooner. We don’t claim perfection at all, and my intention isn’t to preach. It’s to ask others to join us, and perhaps to influence us for the better.)

    One good thing about promoting conservation is that, in the end, it will save money for whomever takes it on. And those who take it on most enthusiastically will save the most money. That’s a lot easier sell than spouting off about planet-saving, even if it’s completely true.

    There is also a strong case for conservation in the name of justice, which most Americans treasure. And yet, Americans use far more of the earth’s resources than we are entitled to just by a head count: The obvious case is that we are 5 percent of the world’s population and use 25 percent of the petroleum, but other examples abound. It’s sweet for us “haves,” but would we stand for this sort of unfair distribution if it weren’t us? Can we really expect the rest of the world, especially those who don’t have enough, just to say, “that’s cool. You go.”? Of course not. We wouldn’t.

    In preparation for the next Sustainable Arlington meeting, I committed to assembling a list of the best conservation techniques, as a basis for what we might promote, if we, as a group, decide to take this on as our primary initiative. (I’m just one member, and not, I wouldn’t say, even a particularly influential one.) The obvious ones are things like low-flow shower heads and compact fluorescent light bulbs, but they’re as limited as they are easy.

    What would you put on the list? What might help persuade you to conserve more. Please share your thoughts in the comments section.

    McCain, a guy I could never vote for…

    Thursday, October 30th, 2008

    When I previously commended McCain for laying bare a couple of absurdities of the Cheney/Bush junta (signing statements, the veep as member of the legislative branch), I said I could vote for him “if it weren’t for all that other stuff.”

    I wasn’t specific at the time, but this flip-flop, delivered by Sarah Palin yesterday, is the most cutting of all:

    And we will control greenhouse gas emissions by giving American businesses new incentives and new rewards to seek, instead of just giving them new taxes to pay and new orders that they must follow — “so says government”. Quote via Alternet.

    For months, cap-and-trade/carbon tax was a settled question: Obama, Clinton, and McCain all promised to regulate carbon emissions. When you tossed in Obama’s support for “clean coal” and nuclear, there was fairly little to distinguish the last men standing in environmental terms.

    Not anymore. One candidate will lead on climate change, and the other will ask businesses to go along.

    Only an idiot would believe that incentives alone would alter the greenhouse-gas picture at all, but certainly not in the emergency timeframe we face. For that matter, only an idiot can have retained much faith in the power of the marketplace to achieve any community aim.

    Director of Green

    Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

    Another in a series of miniprofiles of sustainability-minded people who are working to reduce humankind’s footprint on the planet. To recap, they’re “mini” not only because they’re short, but because all the questions are 10 words or less, and the answers are requested to match. Please, no counting.

    ELAINE STRUNK, Cambridge
    Director of green, The Lenox

    Elaine says her job has a dual focus: “I look for a return for the business, but also a return for the environment.” She has a degree in environmental policy, worked for the city of Phoenix in urban planning and architecture, and worked in environmental education. “I used to work with kids. Now I work educating staff and guests.”

    Green epiphany: “These were values that my family held. When I went to college, they didn’t have any recycling, so I’d save it up and take it to my sister’s house a couple of towns over.”

    Green hero:Mindy Lubber,” president of Ceres, a Boston-based nonprofit whose goal is to integrate sustainability into capital markets. “I really like how she straight-talks. She’s passionate, but she’s educated.”

    A sustainability practice you recently added: “For me, it’s been the food. … Buying local, buying sustainably, and really understanding where my dinner is coming from.”

    An example of greenwashing that really bothers you: “People who think, ‘Oh, we’re 100 percent green now,’ when they’ve done just one thing.”

    The one thing you wish everyone would just get right? “The campaign, this election.”

    Where can hotels make the greatest gains? “There’s a lot of low hanging fruit: Changing light bulbs. Performing energy audits. Monitoring thermostats. Not heating and cooling rooms aren’t sold.”

    A technology you’re most hopeful about: “Right now, we’re really looking into solar thermal.”

    A question I should have asked you? “How do our guests respond to it?”

    And your answer? “When we incorporated in-room recycling, we got an amazing response. I think that’s what people are looking for — involvement.”

    Global climate-change connections

    Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

    gwc-flyer.jpg

    On Saturday, Nov. 1, a trio of Medford community groups are hosting a “global warming cafe,” described as “a community gathering to share what global warming means to each of us. By exchanging views, feelings and ideas, we will begin personal action to stop global warming and learn to make better choices about our own energy use.”

    Snacking begins at 4:30, and the “free, really interactive event” is from 5-7 at the West Medford Community Center
    111 Arlington St. “We especially want to bring in people who haven’t taken action to lower their energy use this winter,” said an organizer, Susan Altman. To RSVP, call 781-483-3042 or send e-mail.

    I may be in New Hampshire stumping for Obama, but otherwise, I’m looking forward to it.

    Meanwhile, tonight is a Boston Green Drinks night: from 6:30 onward at the Other Side Cafe, 407 Newbury St., within site of the entrance of the Hynes stop on the Green Line. If you’re reading this, you’re invited. No charge, of course, though drinks are on you. Just your drinks.